2003-01-14 -+- david -+- forodejazzREMOVE@THISyahoo.es -+- It's very instructive/informative. <br>This article has helped me and I've learned a lot with it. <br> <br>Thanks!DE -+- 195.235.255.227 = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT5)
2003-01-18 -+- Heinz -+-   -+- Thanks. It's time now to do something about SPAM I get every day. <br>You gave me some ideas. <br> <br>Heinz -+- 80.136.6.155 = Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3; Linux)
2003-01-31 -+- Vicki -+-   -+- Thanks. It's very very good article! -+- 195.239.5.31 = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)
2003-02-22 -+- Alexander Langer -+-   -+- Paul Graham has some interesting articles about spam and what to <br>do, especially Bayesian Filters.  The other articles (via the "articles" <br>button in the upper left corner) are also worth reading! <br> <br>http://www.paulgraham.com/antispam.html <br> <br>Alex. <br> -+- 213.7.163.103 = Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021111
2003-03-11 -+- Clay  -+-   -+- Some good info. But obviously this an emotinal topic for you as you also dropped some lead boots up front.  <br> <br>Not every spammer is a criminal. Our server gets plenty of spam from banks and other legimate dealers. Perhaps it is better to say they are folk with a lazy work ethic. <br> <br>Unenrollment. The situation is not good. But you go right off the deep end when you suggest working unenrollment must be manpower intensive. I am sure you could whip up a workable script in less than a day -- if you were motivated. But you are certainly right about parts of the situation, especially the fact that there is no material reason motivating good unenrollment procedures -- except where the laws are changing. Faulty efforts are probably most typical. Then you have a few % that take unenrollment attempts as confirmation of live email address for new master lists. Very bad for individuals but from a system standpoint at least they might trim off email server processing of dead email addresses. But the earnest statistic keepers are actually a good thing. They are at least trying to design spam that receiptents don't mind getting. Or they are dropping folk one way or another.  -+- 216.170.28.182 = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)
2003-08-17 -+- jorge -+- alfredorock@hotmail.com -+- your notes is good, y'm interesting in your comment, and  prefered una write in spanish, thankyou -+- 200.60.196.66 = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
2003-09-10 -+- Göran Göttsche -+- goeran.goettsche(at)gmx.de -+- 1. Bogofilter has moved. It can be found at SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/bogofilter/ <br> <br>2. Excellent article -+- 195.37.205.14 = Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3; Linux 2.4.19-4GB; X11; de, de_DE@euro)
2003-09-28 -+- erich rieder -+-   -+- This site is very helpfull - thanks. <br>During September I made a statistic about where the spam cames from. <br>70% USA/Canada, 15% SouthAmerica, 10% Asia (reg in Australia), and 5% Europe <br> -+- 212.254.77.164 = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)